Verify
Every source should be checkable before a viewer relies on it.
Bibliography
This page collects public source links in one place and turns the site into a practical insight handbook: understand the pattern, preserve the data, and keep facts separate from interpretation.
Every source should be checkable before a viewer relies on it.
Evidence should preserve originals, dates, context, and a calm timeline.
The aim is to reduce brain fog and show patterns without overclaiming.
Handbook
If there is immediate danger, use emergency or specialist support first. Evidence gathering must not increase risk.
Keep original messages, files, photos, recordings, URLs, envelopes, call logs, and account data. Make review copies separately.
Record date, time, place, person, action, witness, source file, and impact. Keep interpretation in a separate notes column.
A screenshot alone can be weak. Add the URL, sender account, phone number, platform, surrounding messages, and how it was received.
Group incidents by behaviour: unwanted contact, proxy pressure, monitoring, threats, reversal, deception, account access, or boundary breaches.
When possible, connect the behaviour pattern to official guidance, statistics, law, or specialist support material. Do not diagnose the person.
Share sensitive material only through appropriate private, legal, safeguarding, police, or specialist support routes. Do not publish private evidence publicly.
Site Map
Sources
These sources are stronger starting points for public claims because they are academic, public-sector, clinical reference, or professional research sources. They still need careful wording and are not a route to diagnose an individual.
These links came from the early research library or useful reading list. They are retained for review, but public claims should prefer primary law, official data, peer-reviewed research, public-sector guidance, or specialist organisations.
These related handbook links are useful review lenses for wording, evidence structure, dysfunctional-system patterns, PEACE-style questioning, and fraud-risk thinking. They are not primary authority and should sit behind official guidance, specialist support, and peer-reviewed sources when public claims are made.
These are watchlist links for insight review, not final authority. A viewer should prefer primary law, official data, public-sector guidance, peer-reviewed research, or specialist organisations when checking a claim.